Pasty Cobbett: Theory of the BB states that unisverse started with a bang.. You know what I mean. BB states that Universes had started from a zero and is expanding in a high rate. and till date people has not been able fully to uderstand futher. To have a clue how BB theory have created energy You wanna might look at the M-theory which states of parallel 3D region and when two parallel 3D region collide togeather it sends a rush of energy to both a regiong creating A effect same as the BB theory or formation of Universe and if you put Dark matter and Dark energy to the Equation of M-Theory you get the same map as of presnt map of the Universe. But M-Theory is not fully accepted just like String Theory because Human till date are on 3 dimensional space and M and String need above 11 dimension to exsit to prove their existance.....Show more
Toby Caswell: The problem here is that energy is a property of our universe, as is space, time, mass, force, etc. Therefore one! cannot necessarily use laws from our universe (such as conservation of energy) and expect that they should also hold in situations like the Big Bang. What does 'energy' mean if you have no universe?The Big Bang created our universe, but the laws of 'pre-physics' that caused the Big Bang are unknown! There's no reason to assume that that these 'pre-physics' laws are the same as our in-universe physics laws.Also, it's worth making a rather philosophical argument - 'energy' is a concept we humans have developed to help us make sense of our observations and has no 'reality' outside of that. It is possible, for example, that an intelligent alien civilisation would develop its own laws of physics that don't include anything like what we would recognise as 'energy'. Maybe they have a completely different way of describing the universe, with entirely different concepts and defined properties, but which also predict the outcome of their experiments....Show more
Felicitas Phil! dor: Big bang theory accounts for the creation of this univers! e, not the stuff and energy this universe is composed of. It also doesn't involve any explosion.You are badly informed.
Giovanna Sherlin: Conservation of subject is an indispensable a part of tremendous bang thought.Time, area and all of the matter or power there can ever be came into existence with the tremendous bang. That so much is commonly authorized. It's a measurable occasion with historical past radiation pervading the universe as a variety of echo or signature. Latest theories proposing feasible methods this event would had been initiated aren't yet widely authorized and anyway the philosophical or theological question. What initiated the quantum vacuum is the same paradox as what created a creator. Its all an awfully long time in the past so who cares? Lets let bozons be bozons. The reply to your question is; No simply the opposite in regards to conservation of matter but interestingly there are signs that below detailed psi conditions linear causality can ! work backwards in time, any person intelligent once mentioned "there is no such thing as a miracle simply gaps in our talents"....Show more
Justin Casten: Common misconception. We don't know what exactly was present before the Big Bang, but it did not create everything from nothing.
Melissa Lavallie: Short answer: The "law of conservation of energy" only applies in Newtonian physics, not in quantum mechanics.Long answer:It used to be that science couldn't answer the question about the origin of the universe or of the Big Bang, but that didn't mean we should make up an answer (such as a god) and say that it was the cause. Within the last few decades scientists have discovered some good answers. Of course, a scientific explanation is more complex than simply saying, "God did it."Quantum mechanics shows that "nothing," as a philosophical concept, does not exist. There is always a quantum field with random fluctuations.There are many well-respected physicists, su! ch as Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Sean M. Carroll, Victor Stenger! , Michio Kaku, Alan Guth, Alex Vilenkin, Robert A.J. Matthews, and Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, who have created scientific models where the Big Bang and thus the entire universe could arise from nothing but a quantum vacuum fluctuation in the quantum field -- via natural processes.In relativity, gravity is negative energy, and matter and photons are positive energy. Because negative and positive energy seem to be equal in absolute total value, our observable universe appears balanced to the sum of zero. Our universe could thus have come into existence without violating conservation of mass and energy â€" with the matter of the universe condensing out of the positive energy as the universe cooled, and gravity created from the negative energy. When energy condenses into matter, equal parts of matter and antimatter are created â€" which annihilate each other to form energy. However there is a slight imbalance to the process, which results in matter dominating over antima! tter.I know that this doesn't make sense in our Newtonian experience, but it does in the realm of quantum mechanics and relativity. As Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman wrote, "The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as she is â€" absurd."For more, watch the video at the 1st link - "A Universe From Nothing" by theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, read an interview with him (at the 2nd link), get his new book (at the 3rd link), or read an excerpt from his book (at the 4th link).-...Show more
Carlee Tangaro: It doesn't. Something or someone has always existed God has always existedSpacetime has always existed ( if you wish, God created Spacetime and chose the Calabi-Yau manifold that defines our universe. )Take your choice. Both statements are equally validSpacetime is pervaded by Dark Energy. A quantum fluctuation releases a! tiny amount of the Dark Energy creating a universe. Google Brian Green! e TED for a 20 minute talk on this. You are looking for "why our universe is fine tuned for life. Or something like that I don't remember the exact title...Show more
Julienne Poplawski: It did not create energy. It (in theory) transferred potential energy into kinetic energy. For example: a grenade is packed with certain explosive materials that hold potential energy, but when ignited, it transfers that potential into kinetic energy which is the explosion.
No comments:
Post a Comment